And those without such status deserved their lot due to sloth and laziness. Take that out and you virtually destroy society. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2014. Note that the invisible hand of the market is still metaphysical in that it must posit some supernatural agency that operates on its own if we but focus on our self-interest, i.e. However two key elements can derail the entire transition into the commons era. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. For now I simply note that in the emerging Commons era the capitalist structure has reached the point where its disasters outweigh its dignities. It also replaces the notion of scarcity with abundance. Some very important messages about the new economy that is diluted by uneven reasoning, Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2014. It's not just the ISPs that want to dominate the internet. However, as put forth in this book, the inevitability of the decline of economies of scale as represented in the current paradigm is not as well supported by the author's arguments. The average American consumes about 3700, while much of humanity on far less than what's needed. This led Herbert Spencer to twist Darwin's idea's into social Darwinism, a justification for “survival of the fittest.” Darwin was aghast at such a torturous distortion of his work. Pedagogy is also having students provide services in their local communities, as well as engage in environmental projects. But a history of the commons shows that self-interest was indeed the exception rather than the rule, and obeying self-governing rules for the public good was the rule. I like his ability to put so many different concepts , history's , and trends together . THE ZERO MARGINAL COST SOCIETY THE INTERNET OF THINGS, THE COLLABORATIVE COMMONS, AND THE ECLIPSE OF CAPITALISM . Along with this came the notion that one was better than others based on their degree of private ownership, if not God. But incentives like the governmental feed-in tariff guarantees a premium price above market value for early adopters of renewable energy production. There too is a version of the “if you can manifest money and own more private property it's a sign of your spiritual progress.” There is no sign of evolving into the kind of commons Rifkin promotes, or the kind of consciousness that goes with it. There are also regressions and progressions depending on a variety of factors. It also includes the very real possibility of selling it to insurance companies which could affect one's coverage and premiums with private information not typically available. In the transitional medieval market economy this shifted to one's hard labor, earnings and property as signs that one was favored by God, which shifted to a more secular notion of one's autonomy and worth as equivalent with one's property. The collaborative commons as Rifkin describes them offers an alternative and an affordable one at that - owning a solar panel. And greatly reduces our ecological footprint in the process. Communicating about our stuff directly with one another has reduced the need for depending on advertisers. Whereas if logistics were managed on the commons model, all of the 535,000 existing distribution centers and warehouses could be shared. He asserts given the infrastructure and fossil fuel supplies involved, there will not likely be further efficiency increases. Focusing on individual material surplus only reinforces our dysfunctional autonomy and represses our empathy. The book would have been a lot more powerful had it been more self reflective about the need for grandiose language. We discussed this at length in several threads but this one ["Complexity and Postmodernism"] is a good place to start, bringing in Cilliars, Morin, Prigogine, Bryant, DeLanda, Deleuze, Bhaskar and others.  This mode is still metaphysical in moving from theological to rational justification. Next was mass electrification and an extension of empathy to larger associations based on cultural, professional and technical affiliation via psychological consciousness. And they did so much more efficiently and at lower cost than the big private companies could. Bruce Gibb. For another it is sustainable, give its additive construction process uses about one tenth the raw materials and wastes far less in the process. (Well, human cloning production is a bit further off.) I have enough to eat and my health care is covered by the VA since I'm a vet. However, there are much more than that. In The Zero Marginal Cost Society, Rifkin takes us on a journey to the future, beyond consumerism to "prosumers" who produce what they consume and share what they have on a Collaborative Commons, a contemporary expression of Gandhi's "Swadeshi." To try to take the book at face value would be a mistake in my opinion. Rather the new tech both transforms capitalism to the next wave and retains values from pre-capitalism, the latter also elevated in the process. Palgrave Macmillan, $28 (352p) ISBN 978-1-137-27846-3 All of the above features of its infrastructure promote those values without regressing to a form of life that cannot change capitalism (107). Whereas renewal energies are abundant. Rikfin argues that the internet and emerging IoT infrastructure are financed by consumers, not big business. It is excerpted from the Integral Postmetaphysical Spirituality forum thread of the same name. In terms of logistics, the capitalist way of handling this is incredibly inefficient and costly. It is no coincidence that Wilber has yet to embrace the emerging Commons, or its concomitant p2p structural dynamics. See this old Gaia thread on Mead for how it relates to postmetaphysicality. Reviewed in the United States on October 4, 2014. Forbes says The Zero Marginal Cost Society is “[an] illuminating new book…Rifkin is very good on the historical origins of the giant, vertically integrated organizations that dominated the 20 Century economy. ‘The Zero Marginal Cost Society’ – a review. There is considerable savings on cargo space, fuel costs and quicker delivery via these shared and distributed logistics. The feudal Great Chain promised salvation by knowing one's place in the hierarchy and doing one's duty. The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism Jeremy Rifkin. They are under the spell of capitalist winner take all mentality that leads inevitably to greed. Not to fret. I give 3 1/2 stars – five for the strengths and two for the weaknesses but because there are no half-stars let’s round this up to four. Even if I weren't I'd likely qualify for very low-cost to free care with Obamacare. Once solar panels are installed on a roof, they generate electric power at a close to a zero marginal cost… The public square was considered a shared resource for meeting, celebrating, sharing and the like. Bruce Gibb. The results were a boom to not only the local but the national economy. Virtual, online classrooms are currently supplementing brick-and-mortar and may eventually replace them. More than that has an inverse relationship on happiness. pfaulhaber, BLOGCRITICS.ORG. He fails to make a clear case as to why ever larger economies of scale, as would be manifested by a decreasing number of companies with ever greater monopolistic power and control of the markets, would not occur as a result of the decreasing marginal cost of goods and services. I would guess these goods might include furniture, clothing, small appliances, personal sundries). A new generation like Yochai Benkler are promoting the Networked Commons, a third alternative to either strict government or market control. looks ahead to life after capitalism. For one thing, it is based on open source software, not intellectual property. This too requires a quick transition to a distributed smart grid system that cannot incapacitate the entire society. Sure, things look rosy in Rifkin's future society but right now not so much. The same is true of certain kinds of complexity, chaos and quantum science as well, explored in the link. Now this battle is playing out over the internet, where mega-business wants to own it and everyone else wants the FCC to declare it a government owned public utility. The build-out of the IoT infrastructure will create a lot of new jobs in the short to mid-term. In chapter 1 [The Great Paradigm Shift from Market Capitalism to the Collaborative Commons] he discusses how monopolies intentionally thwart competition and innovation so as to maintain their stranglehold.
Direct Admit Nursing Programs In Texas, Pauper Edh Rules, The Ordinary Retinol Guide, Ent Question Bank Pdf, Civil Engineering Materials Introduction, Parveen Chicken Jalfrezi, 4th Grade Writing Assignments,